Advanced Analysis of Algorithms (DAA)
Covers advanced analysis of algorithms in DAA. Learn about time and space complexity, asymptotic notations (Big-O, Ω, Θ), performance classes, growth rates and complexity examples with code.
Introduction
This lecture focuses on the analysis of algorithms, which is essential for measuring the efficiency of solutions. While algorithm design solves the problem, algorithm analysis determines how efficiently it is solved in terms of time complexity and space complexity. You will learn about asymptotic notations, performance classifications, and practical examples of analyzing code step by step.
Table of Contents
What Does Algorithm Efficiency Mean?
The ultimate goal of algorithm design is to complete tasks efficiently. Efficiency refers to solving problems using the least possible time and memory resources.
Factors Affecting Running Time
While hardware and software factors (CPU, memory, compiler, coding skills) affect runtime, the two most important factors are:
-
The underlying algorithm
-
The size of the input (n)
Complexity of an Algorithm
The complexity of an algorithm measures the amount of time and/or space required for inputs of size
n.
-
Time Complexity: How fast the algorithm runs.
-
Space Complexity: How much memory it consumes.
Analysis answers:
-
Is the algorithm correct?
-
How efficient is it?
-
Can we find a better algorithm?
Rate of Growth and Time Complexity
-
The rate of growth measures how execution time increases as input size grows.
-
Lower-order terms are dropped when analyzing complexity.
-
Example:
f(n)=n2+n⟹O(n2).
Asymptotic Notations
Big-O Notation (O)
Defines the upper bound (worst-case scenario).
Big-Omega Notation (Ω)
Defines the lower bound (best-case scenario).
Big-Theta Notation (Θ)
Defines the tight bound (average-case or exact growth).
Small-o and Small-ω Notations
Define stricter growth rates compared to Big-O and Big-Ω.
Performance Classifications
Complexity | Classification | Description |
---|---|---|
O(1) | Constant | Fixed runtime regardless of input size |
O(log n) | Logarithmic | Runtime grows slowly as input doubles |
O(n) | Linear | Runtime grows proportionally with input |
O(n log n) | Linearithmic | Efficient sorting and divide-and-conquer methods |
O(n²) | Quadratic | Double nested loops, feasible for small inputs |
O(n³) | Cubic | Triple nested loops, very costly |
O(2ⁿ) | Exponential | Grows extremely fast, brute-force algorithms |
O(n!) | Factorial | Impractical for even small inputs |
Examples of Algorithm Analysis
Constant Time – O(1)
main() {
x = y + z; // Executes once
}
Linear Time – O(n)
for(i=1; i<=n; i++) {
a = b + c;
}
Quadratic Time – O(n²)
for(i=1; i<=n; i++) {
for(j=1; j<=n; j++) {
a = b + c;
}
}
Logarithmic Time – O(log n)
while(n >= 1) {
n = n / 2;
}
n log n Complexity
for(i=1; i<=n; i++) {
for(j=1; j<=n; j = 2*j) {
x = y + z;
}
}
Cubic and Higher Complexity
Nested triple loops often lead to O(n³) or worse.
Why Complexity Analysis Matters
-
Helps compare algorithms independently of hardware.
-
Predicts scalability for large inputs.
-
Distinguishes efficient algorithms from brute force.
-
Crucial for competitive programming, system design, and coding interviews.
Conclusion
The advanced analysis of algorithms focuses on understanding and classifying algorithms by time and space complexity. Using asymptotic notations (O, Ω, Θ), we can measure efficiency and predict performance for large input sizes. Mastery of these concepts allows students to evaluate, compare, and choose the most efficient algorithms for solving computational problems.
For complete detail lecture Lec 3,4